CBI FILES CHARGE SHEET AGAINST TWO SENIOR IAS OFFICERS AND FOUR OTHERS IN THE DLF CASE

New Delhi,31 March, 2005

After receipt of sanctions for prosecution of the concerned public servants from the competent authorities, CBI today filed a Charge Sheet in the Court of Special Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in the DDA-DLF case against S/Shri Subhash Sharma, IAS (UT:1970), former Vice-Chairman, Anand Mohan Sharan, IAS (Haryana :1990), former Commissioner (Land Disposal) and Vijay Risbud former Commissioner (Planning)- all of Delhi Development Authority, New Delhi, Shri Dharambir Khattar, r/o Gurgoan, Shri Ajay Khanna, Chief Executive, M/s. DLF Universal Limited, New Delhi and Shri Ravinder Taneja, Director M/s. Taneja Construction Udyog Limited, New Delhi for offences of criminal conspiracy and various offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The case was registered by CBI on 26.3.2003. After completion of investigation and legal scrutiny, CBI sought sanctions for prosecution against the concerned public servants from the competent authorities in July, 2004.

CBI Investigation disclosed that Shri Subhash Sharma in his official position as Vice-Chairman of Delhi Development Authority intended to show undue favour to M/s. DLF Universal Limited, New Delhi in the matter of grant of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 300 against the existing FAR of 139 in respect of Plot No. 1E, Jhandewalan, New Delhi with the active and wilful participation and cooperation of his subordinates S/Shri Anand Mohan Sharan and Vijay Risbud and demanded an amount of Rs. 1.10 crore from Sh. Ajay Khanna of M/s. DLF Universal Limited through the middleman Shri Dharambir Khattar who acted as conduit between the DDA officials and M/s. DLF Universal Limited. Shri Subhash Sharma kept on changing the meeting dates fixed to decide the DLF matter and only after it was confirmed through Shri Dharambir Khattar that half of the bribe money demanded had been deposited by Shri Ajay Khanna with Shri Ravinder Taneja, he held the meeting on 17.03.2003 without recording the minutes. Investigation also disclosed that in the said meeting it was decided that FAR of 300 would be given to M/s. DLF Universal Limited at 50% of the current rates after open advertisement so that the favour shown to M/s. DLF Universal Limited was not apparent.

CBI found that during the period between November, 2002 and March, 2003, the accused public servants entered into a criminal conspiracy with private accused persons and attempted to show undue favour to M/s. DLF Universal Limited in the matter of grant of extra FAR to Plot No. 1E, Jhandewalan, New Delhi by abusing their official position in DDA and in this process obtained or attempted to obtain consideration other than legal remuneration from Shri Ajay Khanna of M/s. DLF Universal Limited,

New Delhi through the middleman Shri Dharambir Khattar for themselves and/or for other co-accused persons. Investigation also disclosed that Shri Subhash Sharma and Shri Anand Mohan Sharan, further committed offence punishable U/s. 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, as both accepted TATA Mobile Telephones from Shri Dharambir Khattar for themselves as gratification other than legal remuneration as a motive or reward for doing official favour in the matter of allowing increased Floor Area Ratio in the DLF case. The mobile phones provided by the middleman Shri Dharambir Khattar were also meant to facilitate the hatching of the conspiracy and its execution in this case and in other cases.

Through electronic surveillance of I5 telephone numbers including mobile phones registered in the names of the middleman Shri Dharambir Khattar and his family members (which included the aforesaid two telephones provided by Shri Dharambir Khattar to Shri Subhash Sharma and Shri Anand Mohan Sharan) CBI collected incontrovertible evidence regarding the intimate details of the hatching of the conspiracy and its execution, which matched with the developments recorded in the concerned file and was corroborated by other evidence. The purity of the computer recorded telephonic conversations was established during investigation through appropriate expert opinion. The voices of the accused were also forensically matched with their sample voices and also proved through other evidence.

The Charge Sheet has been laid under Sections 120-B IPC (Criminal Conspiracy) r/w Sections 7 (public servant taking gratification other than legal remuneration), 8 (taking gratification, in order, by corrupt or illegal means, to influence public servant) and 15 (punishment for attempt) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Of the four cases registered against various DDA officials and others in March and April, 2003, in all of which Shri Dharambir Khattar acted as a middleman and a conduit for corruption, CBI had already filed charge-sheets in two cases during July, 2004.