“Anyone outsider can become Sena Chief!”
said Sena Supremo 12 years ago.
- by Parinda Bureau, December 30, 2005, 12: 15 IST
Public figures, especially politicians, speak with two tongues.
This is why reading an interview of any public figure after
a gap of years makes an interesting reading. Here is an excerpt
from an interview Shiv Sena Supremo Bal Thackeray gave in
Sept 1994. A lot of water has flown in Mithi River since,
and in fact the mirror has dried up but the issue talked about
in this interview continues to haunt Shiv Sena.
There is a lot of controversy over who is going
to succeed you. Your son, UddhavThackeray, your nephew Raj
Thackeray or any other seasoned politician in your party?
Why are you asking me this question? Have you asked this
question to Narasimha Rao or Sharad Pawar? Why this who and
what? There is so much population and you are still worried
who will be the next PM or the CM?
You must be grooming someone. As the SS chief you
must have someone in mind?
I need not groom anybody. I know what you are implying. Why
don't you have an open mind instead of saying your son and
your brother's son? If they come up I cannot stop them. But
it is not in my gharana that my father developed me and I
developed my sons. There is no kind of dynasty in my house.
Well, I am not going to stop my son if he develops himself
(into a leader). How can I? I am a cartoonist. I took years
to develop that art. My nephew has also developed that art.
You will not call it gbaranshahi. You will ask a doctor, is
your son following your profession. Why don't you pose this
question to me?
Well, I am asking you whether your son will follow
in your foot steps?
You will get the answer. What is the urgency? It is for the
people to decide who they want, not me.
You say it is not dynasty rule. So anyone outside
your family can also take over the mantle?
Oh yes, he can, he can. Why not? But for that I need not
die!
Are you planning to retire from politics?
The time has not come yet. I may retire anytime, even now.
I do not care for anything. I have decided not to do two things
in my life: never write my autobiography and never contest
elections. I don't want to become a PM like Sharad Pawar.
So you may or may not retire?
It is not a question of may not. I may retire also. But why
this question? Where is the question of retiring till a man
can work and his health permits it? The question comes when
a person becomes physically unfit. Much more depends on your
physical and mental fitness. There are many, many unfit persons
in the central government who are holding important portfolios.
Why should I name my successor? What is the need? I can't
understand. How dare you ask for my retirement?